Home  |  Products  |  Scientific Studies  |   Benefits  |  Q & A  |   Order Here  |  Contact
The TiFinity Flosserbrush
TiFinity Oral Care Inc.
Guest Of: [FULLNAME]
Handcrafted in the USA                                                                Copyright TiFinity Oral Care 2009
  Join  |  Member Login 
Scientific Studies:
I.
NEW Abrasion Test for the TiFinity™ Flosserbrush

II.
TiFinity™ Efficacy Comparison to Sonicare Elite

III.
Journal of Clinical Dentistry - Clinical Investigation into the Effect of Toothbrush Wear on Efficacy
I.
NEW Abrasion Test for the TiFinity™ Flosserbrush
Indiana University School of Dentistry/Oral Health Research Institute
By Bruce Schemehorn M.S.
450
RDA
93
RDA
93
RDA
Graph below shows the RDA for a regular nylon toothbrush and a TiFinity Flosserbrush to be at the same level.
RDA =
Relative
Dentin
Abrasion
TiFinity Flosserbrush with toothpaste (RDA=93)

Nylon Toothbrush with toothpaste (RDA=93)

ADA limit of safety is a RDA of 450 or less
II.
TiFinity™ Efficacy Comparison to Sonicare Elite

S.L. Yankell, X. Shi, C.M. Spirgel Yankell Research Consultants Inc. Moorestown, NJ.
Laboratory Interproximal Access Efficacy of the TiFinity and Sonicare Elite Toothbrushes.

Journal of Clinical Dentistry.
Efficacy Comparison: Nylon vs. TiFinity.
TiFinity VS Sonicare: Relative % of Plaque Removal
Laboratory Interproximal Access Efficacy of the TiFinity and Sonicare Elite Toothbrushes.
III.
Journal of Clinical Dentistry - Clinical Investigation into the Effect of
Toothbrush Wear on Efficacy

Journal of Clinical Dentistry

Journal of Clinical Dentistry
Clinical Investigation into the Effect of Toothbrush Wear on Efficacy
Paul R. Warren, LDS
Diane Jacobs, DDS MS
Mari-Anne Low, RDH, MS
Bernard V. Chater, PhD
Dennis W. King, PhD
Oral-B Laboratories
The Gillette Company Boston, MA, U.S.A.
Abstract

It is generally recommended that toothbrushes should be replaced after three-months’ use in order to maintain efficacy. This
clinical investigation employed a single-use, crossover study and a three-month parallel-group study to investigate the effect
of toothbrush wear on plaque and gingival health. Toothbrushes were artificially worn using a laboratory wear machine to
simulate three months of clinical toothbrush use. Results from the single-use study showed that both the new and the worn
toothbrushes significantly reduced whole mouth, marginal and approximal plaque scores from pre- to post- brushing (p<0.
0001). The new brush was, however, significantly more effective that the worn brush, demonstrating 13.4%, 11.0% and
17.0% greater plaque reduction for whole mouth, marginal and approximal sites, respectively (p<0.0001). Results from the
three-month study confirmed this finding, with significant differences in plaque reductions (p<0.0001) between the new and
worn toothbrushes at 6 and 12 weeks for all sites. A significant difference (p<0.0001) between the groups was also found for
mean whole mouth gingivitis scores; this difference favoring the new brush at both 6 and 12 weeks. Examination of hard and
soft oral tissues revealed no significant difference between the new and the worn brushes with respect to safety. It is
concluded that a worn toothbrush is less effective than a new toothbrush for plaque removal and control of gingivitis. (J Clin
Dent 13:119-124, 2002.)
To Print The Above Click Here
So Much More Than A Toothbrush!