III.
Journal of Clinical Dentistry - Clinical Investigation into the Effect of
Toothbrush Wear on Efficacy
Journal of Clinical Dentistry
Journal of Clinical Dentistry
Clinical Investigation into the Effect of Toothbrush Wear on Efficacy
Paul R. Warren, LDS
Diane Jacobs, DDS MS
Mari-Anne Low, RDH, MS
Bernard V. Chater, PhD
Dennis W. King, PhD
Oral-B Laboratories
The Gillette Company Boston, MA, U.S.A.
Abstract
It is generally recommended that toothbrushes should be replaced after three-months’ use in order to maintain efficacy. This
clinical investigation employed a single-use, crossover study and a three-month parallel-group study to investigate the effect
of toothbrush wear on plaque and gingival health. Toothbrushes were artificially worn using a laboratory wear machine to
simulate three months of clinical toothbrush use. Results from the single-use study showed that both the new and the worn
toothbrushes significantly reduced whole mouth, marginal and approximal plaque scores from pre- to post- brushing (p<0.
0001). The new brush was, however, significantly more effective that the worn brush, demonstrating 13.4%, 11.0% and
17.0% greater plaque reduction for whole mouth, marginal and approximal sites, respectively (p<0.0001). Results from the
three-month study confirmed this finding, with significant differences in plaque reductions (p<0.0001) between the new and
worn toothbrushes at 6 and 12 weeks for all sites. A significant difference (p<0.0001) between the groups was also found for
mean whole mouth gingivitis scores; this difference favoring the new brush at both 6 and 12 weeks. Examination of hard and
soft oral tissues revealed no significant difference between the new and the worn brushes with respect to safety. It is
concluded that a worn toothbrush is less effective than a new toothbrush for plaque removal and control of gingivitis. (J Clin
Dent 13:119-124, 2002.)